Home / News / Industry news / What are the key differences between Child R129 booster car seat and Child R129 booster car seat?

Industry news

What are the key differences between Child R129 booster car seat and Child R129 booster car seat?

With the global popularity of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) R129 (i-Size) regulations, parents' awareness of child safety equipment has increased significantly. However, many consumers are confused about the concepts of "child safety seat" and "booster seat" under the R129 standard.
1. Core design differences: from five-point restraint to vehicle seat belt system
Structural definition

R129 child safety seat: adopts an integrated design, equipped with a five-point seat belt system, adjustable headrest and side impact protection device, suitable for infants and young children with a height of 40-105cm (about 0-4 years old).
R129 booster seat: It is designed without a backrest or a simple backrest, relying on the vehicle's three-point seat belt to fix the child, and is suitable for school-age children with a height of 100-150cm (about 4-12 years old).
Fixing method

Child safety seats are required to have ISOFIX hard connection + support legs/anti-rollover plates to ensure rigid fixation;
Booster seats can be fixed with ISOFIX or vehicle seat belts, but the accuracy of the vehicle seat belt path guide is required to be higher.
2. Safety performance comparison: collision test standards reveal protection levels
According to the 2023 report of the European Joint Research Center (JRC), the R129 standard sets differentiated test thresholds for two types of products:

Child safety seats must pass multi-angle collision tests (including forward, lateral and rearward), and the head displacement must be ≤550mm when simulating an impact at a speed of 50km/h;
Booster seats only need to pass forward collision tests, but require the fit error of the seat belt at the clavicle position to be ≤3cm to reduce the risk of "seat belt syndrome".
Data insights: Experiments at Chalmers University of Technology in Sweden show that 4-year-old children using five-point safety seats have 37% less neck force in side collisions, while booster seats focus more on optimizing the sitting height of older children to fit adult seat belts.

3. Selection logic: dual consideration of age and development
Height/weight priority principle
Child R129 booster car seat regulations use height as the main basis for classification (replacing the weight standard of the old regulation R44):

Height <105cm: must use a child safety seat with a five-point restraint;
Height ≥100cm and bone development is mature (shoulders exceed the seat wings): can gradually transition to a booster seat.
Behavioral adaptation
The German ADAC Association recommends: If a child cannot maintain an upright sitting position throughout the ride (such as sleeping with the head tilted forward), the use of a booster seat should be delayed to avoid the risk of strangulation by the seat belt.

The subdivision design of the R129 regulations reflects the scientific nature of child protection: the safety seat protects the fragile cervical spine of young children through an active restraint system, while the booster seat focuses on guiding the adult seat belt to the correct position. Parents should choose products based on the actual development of their children, and consult ECE certified engineers for adaptation testing when necessary, so that every trip becomes "calculated safety".

Contact Us

*We respect your confidentiality and all information are protected.